1: read book
Polit and Beck (2022), a Qualitative Research article.
book link is:
http://opac.fkik.uin-alauddin.ac.id/repository/Denise_F._Polit_Essentials_of_Nursing_Research_Appraising_Evidence_for_Nursing_Practice_Essentials_of_Nursing_Research_Polit____2009.pdf
2：discuss the content of the article as below is good or not, answer each question from question form.
article name is
Managing Patients with Heart Failure: A Qualitative Study of Multidisciplinary Teams with Specialist Heart Failure Nurses.
https://www.annfammed.org/content/13/5/466
| Aspects of the Report |
Critical Appraisal Questions |
Detailed Appraisal
Guidelines |
| Introduction
Statement. of the problem and research question |
- Was the problemstated unambiguously, and is it easy to identify?
- Is the problem significant for nursing?
- Were the questions/aims consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, or ideological orientation?
|
Box 5.3,
page 85
Page 78-82 |
| Literature review |
- Did the reportadequately summarize the existing body of knowledge related to the problemor phenomenon of interest?
- Did the literature review provide a strong rationale for the new study?
|
Box 6.1,
page 100 |
| Method
Protection of humanrights |
- Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard therights of studyparticipants?
- Was the study subjectto external reviewby an IRB/ethics review board?
- Was thestudy designed to minimize risksand maximize benefits to participants?
|
Box 4.2,
page 70 |
| Research designand research tradition |
- Was an adequate amountof time spentwith study participants?
- Was therean adequate numberof contacts withstudy participants?
|
Box 10.1,
page 171 |
| Sampleand setting |
- Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail?
- Was the approach used to recruitparticipants or gain access to the siteappropriate?
- Was the sample size adequate?
- Was saturation achieved?
|
Box 11.1,
page 180 |
| Data collection |
- Was an adequate amountof data gathered?
- Were datacollection and recording procedures adequately described?
- Were datacollected in a manner thatminimized bias or behavioral distortions?
- Is thereevidence of researcher reflexivity?
|
Box 11.2,
page 185 |
| Results
Data analysis |
- Were the data analysis methods sufficiently described?
- Did theanalysis yield an appropriate “product” (e.g., a theory,taxonomy, thematic pattern)?
- Did the analytic procedures suggest that possible biases were avoided?
|
Box 15.1,
page 269 |
| Findings |
- Were the findingseffectively summarized, with good use of excerptsand supporting arguments?
- Do the themesadequately capture the meaning of the data?
- Does it appear that the researcher satisfactorily conceptualized the themes or patterns in the data?
|
Box 15.1,
page 269 |
| Discussion Interpretationof the findings |
- Were the findingsinterpreted within an appropriate socialor cultural context?
- Were majorfindings interpreted and discussed withinthe context of prior studies?
- Does the reportsupport transferability of the findings?
|
Box 15.1,
page 269 |
| Summary Assessment |
- Do the study findings appear to be trustworthy; do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?
- Does the study contribute any meaningful evidencethat can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursingdiscipline?
|
|
Complete Answer:
