A prestigious university has recently implemented a consolidation strategy that will require it to centralize their student records. In order to move forward, the local university will need to develop a data model that will retain student records and perform various data extract transform and load (ETL) processes. Imagine that you have been hired as a database consultant to assist in the development of a data design strategy for the student records.
You met with various university subject matter experts and have determined the following after performing various business analysis processes:
Using these findings, write a 3–4 page paper in which you:
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all supports. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Week 4 Assignment – University DatabaseWeek 4 Assignment – University DatabaseCriteriaRatingsPtsAnalyze the university’s requirements and provide a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Provide an entity relationship model (ERM) that will describe the data structure that will store all data elements.view longer description10 to >8.99 ptsExemplaryThoroughly analyzed the university’s requirements and provided a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Provided an ERM that will describe the data structure that will store all data elements.8.99 to >7.99 ptsCompetent<br>(80-89%)Satisfactorily analyzed the university’s requirements and provided a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Provided an ERM that will describe the data structure that will store all data elements.7.99 to >6.99 ptsNeeds ImprovementPartially analyzed the university’s requirements and provided a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Provided an ERM that will describe the data structure that will store all data elements.6.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not submit or incompletely analyzed the university’s requirements and provided a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Provided an ERM that will describe the data structure that will store all data elements. / 10 ptsAnalyze the university’s requirements and provide a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Describe any assumptions or limitations for each relationship.
For example, professors are able to teach more than one course, or students can only be enrolled in one program.view longer description10 to >8.99 ptsExemplaryThoroughly analyzed the university’s requirements and provide a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Described any assumptions or limitations for each relationship. For example, professors are able to teach more than one course, or students can only be enrolled in one program.8.99 to >7.99 ptsCompetentSatisfactorily analyzed the university’s requirements and provide a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Described any assumptions or limitations for each relationship. For example, professors are able to teach more than one course, or students can only be enrolled in one program.7.99 to >6.99 ptsNeeds ImprovementPartially analyzed the university’s requirements and provide a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Described any assumptions or limitations for each relationship. For example, professors are able to teach more than one course, or students can only be enrolled in one program.6.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not submit or incompletely analyzed the university’s requirements and provided a proposal to organize all the required data elements: Described any assumptions or limitations for each relationship.
For example, professors are able to teach more than one course, or students can only be enrolled in one program / 10 ptsCreate the primary key and foreign keys using a UML class diagram for each table.view longer description15 to >13.49 ptsExemplaryThoroughly created the primary key and foreign keys using a UML class diagram for each table.13.49 to >11.99 ptsCompetentSatisfactorily created the primary key and foreign keys using a UML class diagram for each table.11.99 to >10.49 ptsNeeds ImprovementPartially created the primary key and foreign keys using a UML class diagram for each table.10.49 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not submit or incompletely created the primary key and foreign keys using a UML class diagram for each table. / 15 ptsSuggest at least four types of business intelligence reports that could help the university in course management, student enrollment, or historical tracking. Support your answer by providing specific business functions that these reports could assist executives of the university.view longer description20 to >17.99 ptsExemplaryThoroughly suggested at least four types of business intelligence reports that could help the university in course management, student enrollment, or historical tracking.
Supported your answer by providing specific business functions that these reports could assist executives of the university.17.99 to >15.99 ptsCompetentSatisfactorily suggested at least four types of business intelligence reports that could help the university in course management, student enrollment, or historical tracking. Supported your answer by providing specific business functions that these reports could assist executives of the university.
15.99 to >13.99 ptsNeeds ImprovementPartially suggested at least four types of business intelligence reports that could help the university in course management, student enrollment, or historical tracking. Partially supported your answer by providing specific business functions that these reports could assist executives of the university.13.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not submit or incompletely suggested at least four types of business intelligence reports that could help the university in course management, student enrollment, or historical tracking. Did not support your answer by providing specific business functions that these reports could assist executives of the university. / 20 ptsSuggest three vendors that developed and are employing efficient registrar and school management database systems and support your reasons to choose from one of these three vendors.view longer description15 to >13.49 ptsExemplary.
Thoroughly suggested three vendors that developed and are employing efficient registrar and school management database systems and supported your reasons to choose from one of these three vendors.13.49 to >11.99 ptsCompetentSatisfactorily suggested three vendors that developed and are employing efficient registrar and school management database systems and supported your reasons to choose from one of these three vendors.11.99 to >10.49 ptsNeeds ImprovementPartially suggested three vendors that developed and are employing efficient registrar and school management database systems and partially supported your reasons to choose from one of these three vendors.10.49 to >0 ptsUnacceptable.
Did not submit or incompletely suggested three vendors that developed and are employing efficient registrar and school management database systems and did not support your reasons to choose from one of these three vendors. / 15 ptsCompare and contrast the key aspects that each system offers.view longer description15 to >13.49 ptsExemplaryThoroughly compared and contrasted the key aspects that each system offers.13.49 to >11.99 ptsCompetentSatisfactorily compared and contrasted the key aspects that each system offers.11.99 to >10.49 ptsNeeds ImprovementPartially compared and contrasted the key aspects that each system offers.10.49 to >0 ptsUnacceptableDid not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the key aspects that each system offers.
/ 15 ptsProvide three references.view longer description5 to >4.49 ptsExemplaryExceeded the required number of references; all references were high-quality choices.4.49 to >3.99 ptsCompetentMet the required number of references; all references were high-quality choices.3.99 to >3.49 ptsNeeds ImprovementDid not meet the required number of references; some references were poor-quality choices.3.49 to >0 ptsUnacceptableNo references provided. / 5 ptsClarity, writing mechanics, and SWS formatting requirements.view longer description10 to >8.99 ptsExemplary0–2 errors present.8.99 to >7.99 ptsCompetent3–4 errors present.7.99 to >6.99 ptsNeeds Improvement5–6 errors present.6.99 to >0 ptsUnacceptableMore than 6 errors present. / 10 pts