Q. Hurd’s chapter on the international labour organization (ILO) provides a rather positive account of its role and procedures as compared to other IOs he examines. DiGiacomo provides a much more critical account of the ILO, suggesting it has potential to address work-related challenges of economic globalization, but remains outdated and largely ineffective. What do you think? Would you conclude that the ILO is the workers’ champion or a 90-pound weakling?
Reference
Ian Hurd’s International Organizations: Politics, Law, Practice