SUICIDE

Similarity less than 10 %

Please read carefully all instructions this assignment is very important .You have to use assignment 2

Dont forget add pro and cons.

 

Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Scholarly Paper (25 points)

In this assignment, students will examine the selected bill from Assignment 2 and critically analyze and evaluate the context in which the area of concern or issue relates to the policy making process.

 

Assignment Criteria 1, 2, and 3 will be from Assignment 2. Review Assignment 2 and make any corrections and/or updates to complete assignment criteria Assignment 3. Please review Self-Plagiarism in the American Psychological Association (APA) on page 256/Section 8.3. Pay attention to bullet point two: Introduce the duplicated material such as “as I have previously discussed.” Additionally, this information will show as a match in the Turnitin Originality Report as you will be using previous work from Assignment 2.

 

Assignment Criteria:

Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following criteria:

1. State the selected bill including the bill number and title from Assignment 2.
2. Provide a summary of the issue or problem related to the chosen state or federal bill from Assignment 2.
3. Describe the background information related to the issue or problem, include key regulatory and legislative history and any related data from Assignment 2.
4. Identify all direct and indirect stakeholders and their position on the area(s) of concern.
5. Evaluate how the issues will affect stakeholders at an institutional, local, state, and federal level.
6. Identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) to the bill.
7. Using The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing, critique the role of the nurse leader as a change agent in policy-making.
8. The scholarly paper should be in narrative format, 7 to 8 pages excluding the title and reference page.
9. Include an introductory paragraph, purpose statement, and a conclusion.
10. Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the paper.
11. Write the paper in third person, not first person (meaning do not use ‘we’ or ‘I’) and in a scholarly manner; except for the self-plagiarized material utilized for assignment criteria 1, 2, and 3.
12. Include three professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal references to support the paper (review in Ulrich’s Periodical Directory) and be less than five (5) years old.
13. APA format required (attention to spelling/grammar, a title page, a reference page, and in-text citations).
14. Submit the assignment to Turnitin prior to the final submission, review the Originality Report, and make any needed changes.
15. Submit by the posted due date.

.

Assignment 3: Policy Analysis Scholarly Paper Grading Rubric (25 points)

Assignment Criteria	10 points	8 points	6 points	4 points
	All topics/criteria addressed, and all questions fully answered.	One or more topics/criteria not addressed or completely answered	All topics/criteria addressed, and most questions fully answered	One or more topics /criteria not addressed, and most questions partially answered
Quality/Accuracy of Information	8 points	6 points	4 points	2 points
	Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It includes several supporting details and/or examples.	Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. It provides supporting details and/or examples.	Information clearly relates to the main topic/criteria. A few details and/or examples are given.	Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic/criteria.
Organization	4 points	3 points	2 points	1 point
	Information is very organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading.	Information organized with well-constructed paragraphs and levels of heading.	There is an attempt at organization, but errors exist. No levels of heading.	The information or overall structure appears disorganized.
Sources	3 points	2 points	1 point	0 points
	All references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe, or a classic/ historical source.	The majority of references are from a relevant professional peer-reviewed scholarly journal, within a 5-year timeframe or a classic/historical source.	Some references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years.	Majority of references are from non-peer-reviewed scholarly sources or older than 5-years.
Earned Points
Up to 10% of the assigned points (total points of assignment) can be deducted from the earned points for errors in APA style [title page, introduction, purpose statement, level heading, conclusion, references, citations, and format], spelling, and/or grammar.
Final Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Policy Brief: Suicide Prevention

Name

Course

Institution

Date

 

 

 

 

 

Purpose

The purpose of this policy briefing is to provide basic insights on the effects of suicide, the federal bills available, policy alternatives, and recommend appropriate actions. The policy briefing is prepared for decision makers, policy makers, and other stakeholders in public health, including social workers in the areas of social protection an education both at the state and local levels.

 

The Federal Bill

The chosen federal bill is the suicide prevention Act which was introduced to the Congress on May 4, 2021. In the legislative process, the bill is in the first stage and according to GovTrack.us. (2021), the sponsors of the bill are Chris Stewart (R-UT) and Doris Matsui (D-CA). The bill was introduced with the main aim of authorizing an initiative of expanding and intensifying surveillance of suicide. The government would provide grants that would help in suicide prevention services.

 

The Issue

In the United States, suicide is ranked among the top 10 causes of death and it has been an evident problem in the United States. In 2016, suicide was responsible for over 40,000 deaths and there were a lot of people hospitalized as a result of suicide attempts. A lot of adults report suicide attempts. “Suicide and nonfatal self-directed violence result in an estimated $69 billion in combined medical and work loss costs” (CDC, 2018). It is important to note that this figure does not include societal effects of suicide, and this implies that the real cost and effects of suicide are even higher. According to GovTrack.us. (2021), the bill was meant to authorize grants to state and local health departments that would help prevent suicide.

 

Background Information

Suicide has been a problem in the United States for many years and the government and the field of public health have been working on preventing the problem for a long time. The U.S public Health Service introduced the first suicide prevention center in 1958, and a lot of other centers followed thereafter. According to Graves (2018) there are also a lot of bills witch have been enacted over the years to help in the prevention of suicide. An example is the Garrett Lee Smith Memorial Act (GLSMA) of 2004 which aimed at providing grants to different institutions that would aide suicide prevention. Another one was the Joshua Omvig Veterans Suicide Prevention Act (JOVSPA) of 2007 which was a federal law aimed at preventing suicide among veterans. “In the United States, as of October 9, 2017, 10 (20%) states had passed legislation mandating health care professionals complete suicide prevention training, and 7 (14%) had policies encouraging training” (Grave et al., 2017). There are continued milestones being made in the prevention of suicide up to date.

 

Policy Options and Alternatives

Improving access to behavioral and mental health services

There are a lot of people with issues such as anxiety and depression who can’t access treatment for various reasons such as lack of social workers, psychiatrists, and psychologists, financial insecurities, and lack of insurance coverage. There is need to improve access by integrating primary care and mental healthcare, increasing access to tele-health services, and increasing health insurance coverage. All these will take around 6 months or less. As far as it may be difficult to implement, it will benefit a lot of people in the U.S

Reducing stigma in the society

There are cultural values that may not allow people with mental problems to seek help. Reducing stigma will see a lot of people seek help and develop surroundings that can reduce suicide rates. A training of three months in the communities will help achieve this.

Working with community representatives and community members to reduce suicide risks

Encouraging the community on safe storage of dangerous households that aid suicide such as firearms and medications will help reduce the rates of suicide. Families will ensure at-risk individuals are separated from lethal product. It will be difficult to ensure each household stores lethal products safely, but once implemented, it will save a lot of lives.

 

Stakeholder perspectives

Public health professionals, the government, community representatives, and families have always supported proper use and storage of items such as firearms. All these stakeholders have always encouraged the expansion of healthcare services to include people with mental health problems. The implementation of the above policy options will be supported by all the stakeholders

 

Recommendations

The implementation of comprehensive mental health programs will help in suicide prevention. There must be a comprehensive analysis of the available programs and the goals and objectives in order to ensure the programs introduced are effective and sustainable in suicide prevention.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, 2018). Connectedness, I. PREVENTING SUICIDE IN RURAL AMERICA.

Graves, J. M., Mackelprang, J. L., Van Natta, S. E., & Holliday, C. (2018). Suicide prevention training: Policies for health care professionals across the United States as of October 2017. American journal of public health, 108(6), 760-768.

GovTrack.us. (2021). H.R. 2955 — 117th Congress: Suicide Prevention Act. Retrieved from https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/hr2955